The debate over the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands has been forcefully reintroduced following the recent match between Argentina and England in the World Cup, and this time it even reached well-known British media.
In a column published in The Guardian, journalist Simon Jenkins argued that, while the issue does not admit simple answers, the islands “cannot remain British forever,” reigniting a historically sensitive topic for both countries.
This discussion occurs in an international context where the United Kingdom has been reviewing situations inherited from its imperial past.

The case of Gibraltar
Jenkins used the recent agreement between Great Britain and Spain to tear down the border separating Gibraltar from Spanish territory as a starting point, describing the understanding as the result of “decades of negotiation” and a “happy compromise.”
From that precedent, the author suggested that a similar process could eventually open up regarding the Falklands. He even linked the resurgence of the topic to the historic defeat of England against Argentina in the World Cup semifinal, after which a flag appeared on the field regarding Argentina's sovereignty over the islands.
In that context, the journalist asked: “Can nothing good follow the generous embrace of Lionel Messi and Harry Kane?.”
In his analysis, Jenkins questioned the idea of indefinite permanence of overseas territories under British control. “None of the territories from the British imperial era has an eternal right to remain as they are,” he stated, highlighting the economic cost of maintaining that situation, noting that the defense of the Falklands costs over 60 million pounds annually.











