Strada lashed out at RIGI and the tax cuts, defending the inherited tax scheme
Nuevo
Agregar La Derecha Diario en
Compartir:
The ultra-Kirchnerist deputy Julia Strada was once again exposed in Congress after she accused President Javier Milei of "passing laws without funding", in an attempt to question the tax reduction policy promoted by the national government. In her speech, the legislator proceeded to list taxes that were eliminated or reduced, as if lowering the tax burden were a crime and not a necessary correction after decades of state voracity.
"You voted without having a source of funding, you eliminated Personal Assets Tax... You eliminated many taxes!", Strada reproached, revealing a tax conception typical of hardline Kirchnerism, where the State must always collect more, even when that suffocates workers, companies, and retirees.
In her presentation, the deputy also questioned the Incentive Regime for Large Investments (RIGI), which she accused of having reduced "a large part" of the taxes that fell on productive projects. For Kirchnerism, any scheme that incentivizes private investment and job creation is suspicious, especially if it implies taking away the State's tax-collecting power.
Strada also criticized the modification of tax rates in key sectors, such as the soybean complex. In that context, she reproached the Government for having set the "soy steel" rate in October, in a confusing technical reference that once again showed the K bloc's rejection of any review of the inherited export duty scheme.
The central point of her anger, however, was the official plan to reduce the income tax. The deputy openly rejected the possibility of easing the burden on workers and companies, a stance consistent with the Kirchnerist model that for years used this tax as a tool of covert adjustment, even on wages that were losing against inflation.
Julia Strada, diputada kirchnerista.
From the Government, the position is clear: Argentina needs to leave behind the model of high taxes, money printing, and chronic deficit. The elimination of distortionary taxes and the reduction of the tax burden are part of a comprehensive strategy of macroeconomic stabilization, genuine growth, and recovery of the private sector.
Strada's criticism only serves to confirm the contrast between two models. On one side, a Government that seeks economic growth by reducing taxes and unproductive spending. On the other, a Kirchnerism that continues to defend an oversized State, financed by force of taxes, inflation, and stagnation.
