Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi are disputing 50 million euros in their divorce. What changes with the adultery accusation?
The conflict arose some time ago when the media personality and the footballer carried out a division of assets after the scandal of Icardi's infidelity with China Suárez in 2021. In that agreement, Wanda kept properties valued at this figure, such as an apartment in Rome, a house on Lake Como, and another in Milan.
The separation between Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi continues to make headlines, and this time, it's the million-dollar amount in their division of assets. Yanina Latorre revealed the details about the legal battle over millions of euros involving the media personality and the footballer.
The recent ruling by the Italian Justice, which endorsed Icardi's divorce request due to adultery, could bring significant economic consequences for Wanda. Yanina Latorre, panelist of "LAM," was the one who disclosed this figure, assuring that the former couple is playing for a million-dollar sum.
According to Latorre, Wanda confessed that the value of the division of assets reaches 50 million euros. "If Icardi manages to prove adultery, he could request that the division of assets be reversed. This would put Wanda in a very unfavorable economic position," explained the panelist on Ángel de Brito's show.
The agreement between Wanda and Mauro, which included high-value properties, could be in jeopardy if it is confirmed that the footballer is right. If adultery is verified, the division of assets could be annulled, and Wanda would lose those properties and her current rental income from them.
The Italian Justice, which admitted Icardi's accusation, will investigate whether Wanda was indeed unfaithful while they were still married. Unlike Argentine legislation, adultery in Italy is treated as a key factor in separation.
Ángel de Brito shared on his social media a formal document confirming the start of the investigation. The partial divorce ruling allows the couple to live separately while the accusation continues its judicial course.
