
Queimada strongly criticized Roque García regarding the UN
The spokesperson and PPL leader doesn't hold back and acts accordingly
The former candidate for mayor of Montevideo from the Republican Coalition representing Cabildo Abierto—who garnered just 0.65% support—achieved his second failure by debating Esteban Queimada on social media about the role of the United Nations.
The retired colonel stated:
[...]the UN is an organization that seeks to prevent humanity from becoming extinct in the next war. That's why it was created, obviously there are some sectors that have been co-opted by gender ideology, etc. But that's only here, in other countries all that, you don't even hear about it.
Queimada attacked bluntly:
The UN and all the globalists have claimed the power to speak on behalf of "humanity," which is an abstract entity, radically apolitical and impossible to represent.We must think in terms of Uruguay, from and for Uruguay.This is the time for patriots, Roque, not for the defenders of a regime made up of stateless, anti-democratic, and anti-republican entities who, with their "experts" and their "philanthropists" at the head of international organizations, claim for themselves the titles of legitimacy of a new form of global governance that leaves peoples without culture, without identity, without sovereignty, and without freedom.

Roque García was left completely silent.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
After the exchange, the leader of the Platform for Freedom made a statement on his X profile where he declared:
You can't fight the "Cultural Battle" in Uruguay by vindicating international organizations.
The UN and its tentacles govern the countries that "sell their rich heritage at the vile price of necessity."
UNESCO dictates how we must educate our children and which cultural expressions should be promoted and imposed.
The ILO dictates how labor laws should be drafted.
FAO and IFAD set their standards for food production.
I could go on listing funds and programs, regional commissions, and credit organizations, etc.
Anyone who supports this form of global governance can't consider themselves a patriot or a sovereigntist.
Much less claim they're going to fight the "Cultural Battle" from their political parties that lick the boots of external power.
p>You may also be interested in: the internal awards of Frente Amplio.
The pro-globalism coalitionist felt alluded to by the post and replied:
Of course you can!! Who are you to claim otherwise, Esteban? We must send people again who are capable of defending the interests of the people in those organizations.
Do you really think the problem is the UN? There are member countries of the Human Rights Committee that stone adulterers, and you think the problem is the UN! NO ESTEBAN THAT'S NOT IT. More depth is needed to separate the wheat from the chaff. Please.

Caustic as usual, Queimada counterattacked:
Don't ask me for a "depth" you don't have, not even to "argue" your defense of the UN.
You live in Switzerland, not in a cloud of farts in limbo.
Don't come to me with childish talk about human rights and "interests of the people" either.
After the stony silence of the Cabildo Abierto member, Queimada published one of the many official documents showing how he has served in United Nations missions and asked him:
Is it for this kind of thing that you defend the UN, Roque García?
The member of the Republican Coalition for Cabildo Abierto has remained stuck in time.
It may be appropriate to recall the epic speech that the Argentine president, Javier Milei, delivered at the United Nations Summit of the Future, last September 2024 in New York:
Under the tutelage of this organization and the adoption of these ideas—over the last 70 years—humanity has experienced the longest period of global peace in history.
An international forum was created, where nations could solve their conflicts through cooperation, instead of resorting—instantly—to arms.
Something unthinkable was achieved: to permanently seat the five largest powers in the world, with equal veto power, despite having opposing interests.
Because where trade enters, bullets do not—said Bastiat—
Trade guarantees peace, freedom guarantees trade, and equality before the law guarantees freedom.This is what has happened—mostly—under the tutelage of the United Nations in its early decades, and That's why we are talking about a remarkable success in the history of nations that can't be overlooked.
However, this organization stopped safeguarding the principles outlined in its founding declaration and began to mutate.It became a multi-tentacled Leviathan, seeking to decide not only what each nation-state must do, but also how all the citizens of the world must live.
The original model has been replaced by a supranational government of international bureaucrats who impose a specific way of life.
What is being discussed at the Summit of the Future is nothing other than the deepening of that tragic course.
p>You may also be interested in: how the Communist Party is financed.The 2030 Agenda, although well-intentioned, is nothing more than a supranational government program, socialist in nature, that threatens sovereignty, life, liberty, and property.
It has been precisely the adoption of that agenda that distorted the role of this institution and set it on the wrong path.
An organization that was born to defend the rights of man has become one of the main promoters of the systematic violation of freedom. As—for example—with the global quarantines of 2020, which should be considered a crime against humanity.
In the words of Manuel Adorni: The end.
More posts: