Just a month ago, when one dared to speak of signs that the Argentine economy was finding its way, it could still be debated whether these were incipient signals. Today, those perspectives are confirmed. There are no doubts left. The signs of growth and economic improvement have become a reality.
It is a marvel the state we are in, when we think that in December 2023 this administration inherited a dozen and a half nuclear bombs ready to explode from the very first moment. There were due dates for quasi-fiscal debt (concentrated in Leliqs for one day), fiscal debt, futures, and puts from the Central Bank that literally expired every day. There were tens of billions of dollars that had to be faced.
Not only did we get out of that. Then the economy was stabilized in a year and a half. Despite the blows of legislative nonsense and destabilizing maneuvers that we all know.
The three pillars of the new economic regime
But what really happened in Argentina, and I believe not everyone perceives, is that there was a genuine change in the economic regime. That change had three main pillars:
The first was fiscal. It was not simply about fiscal surplus or recovering fiscal solvency. Many spoke in the past about recovering that solvency, but the strategy always ended up increasing state revenues, that is, increasing the burden on the people. Here, what was truly revolutionary was achieving solvency from day one through spending cuts. This meant less fiscal burden for the people and resulted in us having a primary surplus every month since this administration took office. We have a primary surplus and we have a final or financial surplus. All of this means that debt, instead of increasing, is decreasing. This is an economy in de-leveraging.
The second pillar was financial and monetary. The currency control was eliminated, despite all that was said about it not being possible to remove it. At the same time, dollars are being bought at a pace like never before. Meanwhile, country risk has decreased, ratings have increased, and maturities have been cleared.
The third pillar was competitive opening: opening up to external competition and also opening internal competition, strictly respecting price mechanisms. The Argentine economy was blocked by a multitude of regulations, hyper-regulations, and micro-regulations that created tolls and kiosks of different types in the path of those who wanted to produce.
There were even rules that literally implied the prohibition of production. Without a new Glacier Law, the reality of Argentine mining would be a fiction.
The search for competition and openness led to a remarkable phenomenon: Argentine trade is at a record high. In decades, there has not been such a participation of foreign trade in Argentine output. Additionally, we have a growing trade surplus since the first month. It was said that to compete a very high exchange rate and trade barriers were required, which proved to be false.
We are experiencing a record trade surplus, and industrial exports, which were supposed to be the most affected according to that theory of the need for a super high dollar, are absolutely at a record with this dollar.
The exchange rate is well below the upper floating band. From the first day the currency control was lifted, many claimed it would surpass the upper band. Far from that, today it is actually quite distant.
Surpluses and a new economic geography
So we have a primary surplus, a final financial surplus, and a trade surplus. These are three surpluses. And I can add another: this year we will have a current account surplus. Argentina is flooding with dollars. Dollars are pouring in because there is an extraordinary investment process and because there is once again confidence in the currency. We are in a different economic geography.
The increase in demand for pesos is allowing not only for the fall of inflation. It is also reflected in the increase in the supply of dollars and in a flourishing of different sectors of economic activity. It is increasingly becoming less true that there are some sectors doing well, but many doing poorly. It is logical, because those sectors with the most growth potential pull the rest along.







