The judiciary ordered the corrupt Cristina Kirchner to pay $684 billion.

Federal Oral Court No. 2 ordered former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and the other eight convicted in the "Vialidad" case to pay $684.990 billion as forfeiture for defrauding the State through the rigging of public works contracts in Santa Cruz. The amount was determined by official experts from the Supreme Court of Justice and reflects the updated value of the damage caused.

Judge Jorge Gorini granted a period of ten business days to settle the amount. If they fail to do so, the auction of the bassets registered in the names of the convicted individuals will proceed. The court ruling states that the sum must be paid jointly by the nine involved, who must agree on the payment method. Otherwise, asset seizure will be enforced.

Cristina Kirchner, through her expert witness, José Lucas Gaincerain, submitted an alternative calculation that drastically reduces the amount: he estimates that the total to be returned is $42.494 billion, just 6% of the amount set by the court experts.

The discrepancy is based on the updating method: while the official experts applied the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the defense expert used the passive rate of the Central Bank, arguing that it better represents the evolution of the financial value of money.

In its ruling, Federal Oral Court No. 2 supported the report prepared by the official expert and validated the use of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from INDEC as the criterion for updating the forfeiture amount. "The reasons provided by the accounting expert are considered solid and duly justified, in accordance with the accounting standards invoked as the basis for her technical actions in updating the amount at issue here", the judges stated.

They also emphasized that the methodology adopted by the official expert was not challenged by any of the party experts, despite representing opposing interests in the process. "To such an extent that, beyond the opinions of the experts representing the parties' interests, none of them questioned or challenged the specific methodology chosen and explained by the official expert", they added.

In this context, the court rejected the expert report submitted by Cristina Kirchner's accountant, José Lucas Gaincerain, stating that it deviated from the reference value accepted throughout the entire investigation. "The updating calculation he performed was based on a different reference value than the one indicated and on which the other accounting experts issued their opinions; this circumstance exempts us from any further consideration regarding the calculation method itself", the judges concluded.