Six organizations demanded a firm commitment to freedom of expression in Ecuador
During Rafael Correa's government, measures were implemented that many consider detrimental to free journalism. State control and persecution of media were constant tools, according to the signing organizations.
Daniel Noboa has shown openness to dialogue with sectors of the press and has avoided confrontational speeches. His stance contrasts with that of Luisa González, whose alliance with the Citizen Revolution raises concerns about a possible return to restrictive practices.
In the final stretch toward the presidential runoff on April 13, six international organizations urged Daniel Noboa and Luisa González to guarantee press freedom. The entities warned about the growing deterioration of journalistic practice in Ecuador, worsened by insecurity and informational restrictions.
The statement was signed by CPJ, SIP, RSF, FLIP, Fundamedios, and Journalists Without Chains, who addressed a letter to both candidates. There, they demanded five essential commitments to protect independent journalism, highlighting that its defense is vital for democracy.
Among the proposed actions are: guaranteeing access to information, avoiding political or judicial reprisals against the press, and fostering a safe environment for journalists. They also demanded avoiding any form of prior censorship or penalization of journalistic work.
The document warned that journalism in Ecuador suffers from persistent violence, stigmatization from power, and judicial abuses. Additionally, it warned about the risk of returning to restrictive policies like the Correa-era Communication Law, which severely limited informational freedom.
"Free and independent journalism is under constant threat," the collectives stated. They pointed out that many journalists have been assaulted, threatened, exiled, or even killed, and that media face digital blockades and economic pressure.
In this scenario, respect for press freedom becomes a key point in the candidates' proposals. Institutional strengthening and active transparency are pillars of a democratic government, experts point out.
The demand of these six organizations highlights the urgency of leadership committed to democratic values. In this context, Daniel Noboa's dialoguing and proactive attitude positions him as a favorable alternative against the shadows of an authoritarian past.
