''Where was the individualized examination of those murders, of the aggravating circumstances, and of the devastating impact on the families?'', she asked. ''Clemency is an extraordinary act of mercy. It is not an automatic process.''
Schubert also argued that the governor did not notify district attorneys in advance about the commutations, which raised further questions about the transparency of the procedure.
President Donald Trumpharshly criticized the Democratic governor of California,Gavin Newsom, for commuting the death sentences of 548 inmates on the state's death row, a decision that sparked outrage among victims' families and opened a new legal front. Trump called the measure a ''disaster for justice in the United States'' and expressed hope that it would be revoked.
In his first public statements about the disastrous decision, Trump posted a message on Truth Social on Saturday questioning Newsom's intervention to modify the sentences of all those convicted, including individuals responsible for multiple murders.
''Many of these individuals, people who have killed over and over again, cannot believe their luck at having such an incompetent and insensitive governor who does not allow the long and tortuous legal system to prevail,'' the president wrote.
President Donald Trump annihilated the Democratic governor of California for commuting the death sentences of nearly 600 prisoners
The president also focused on the suffering of the victims' families, who believe that the governor's decision represents a new blow after years of legal proceedings and waiting for the sentences imposed by the courts to be carried out.
''The families of those who were murdered so brutally are, rightly, devastated. Let’s hope this decision is revoked!'', Trump added, describing the inmates who benefited as ''some of the most cold-blooded killers to ever walk the face of the Earth.''
The criticism was not limited to the president. Families of several victims also expressed their outrage at a measure that Newsom presented as a morally necessary decision, but which for those affected means reducing the penalties imposed on those who destroyed their lives.
The American president put himself in the place of those families whose losses were insulted by the Democrat's decision
A legal battle against Gavin Newsom's pathetic decision
The controversy also began to move to the courts. Victim advocacy organizations announced that they would seek to challenge the commutations and question the legality of the procedure used by the governor.
Anne Marie Schubert, former district attorney who currently heads the ''Criminal Defense Legal Foundation'', stated that her organization will promote a judicial review of the decisions. She explained that commutations of sentences are usually evaluated individually, rather than applied broadly to hundreds of convicts.
During a press conference on Thursday, Schubert questioned why Newsom adopted a collective measure without publicly considering the particulars of each murder, the aggravating circumstances, and the impact suffered by the families.
For his part, the district attorney of Orange County, Todd Spitzer,announced that he would ask the state Supreme Court to block the measures. Current legislation states that commutations of sentences for criminals with multiple serious offenses require the approval of that court to take effect.
The Orange County district attorney announced that he will ask the California Supreme Court to block the Democratic measure
Newsom defends his stance despite victims' rejection
In announcing the decision, GavinNewsom acknowledged that he would face strong criticism, especially from families who relied on the judicial system to obtain justice for the murders of their loved ones. The governor claimed to respect the opinions of those who oppose it, including families who suffered irreparable losses, but maintained that he considered his intervention morally justified.
''I adopt this measure because I firmly believe that state-sanctioned executions are incompatible with California's values, undermine the foundations of our legal system, and degrade us all,'' he stated.
However, his ridiculous arguments have not managed to dispel the criticism from those who believe that his ideological stance has ultimately overridden the sentences handed down by the courts and the expectations of the victims.
The Democratic governor of California tried to rely on “morality” to commute the sentences of savage murderers
California houses the largest population of death row inmates in the United States, but has not executed any inmate since 2006. In 2019, Newsom established a moratorium on executions through an executive order, which had already halted the application of the death penalty during his tenure.
The new decision expands that shift by modifying the sentences of the 548 inmates, who will now face life imprisonment instead of the death penalty. Although the commutations do not imply an immediate release, critics warn that they substantially alter the punishment imposed by the courts.
The episode could also have consequences for Gavin Newsom's national political aspirations, who is contemplating a possible presidential candidacy in 2028. The controversy over the death penalty places the governor under greater scrutiny and raises questions about the political cost of a decision that pits his personal convictions against the demands for justice from numerous victims' families.