Wanda Nara asks Mauro Icardi to be banned from leaving the country due to food debt

The conflict between Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi has added a new judicial chapter. After the forward requested the enforcement of the precautionary measure that prohibits showing the faces of their daughters on social media, the MasterChef Celebrity host responded with a legal counterattack that directly targets her ex-partner's freedom of movement.

According to journalist Naiara Vecchio's revelations on her social media, Icardi would owe child support payments since April. For that reason, Wanda Nara has once again requested a travel ban for the footballer. “Mauro Icardi has owed child support since April and Wanda Nara is once again requesting a travel ban,” the journalist reported.

The claim focuses on the non-compliance with the provisional child support payments for the couple's daughters. It has emerged that Icardi had settled a previous debt, but then failed to maintain regular payments. This situation is not new: before traveling with China Suárez, the player needed a judicial authorization to leave the country, which the judge granted.

The amount of the provisional payment would have been calculated based on the salary Icardi earned while playing for Galatasaray. Today, the situation is different: the footballer is without a club and, therefore, does not receive a fixed income. This difference exacerbates the disagreement between the parties.

Two years of separation and no definitive agreement

Although they have been effectively separated for about two years, Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi have still not managed to set the definitive amount for child support. For this reason, the provisional scheme remains in effect, which is now back at the center of the dispute.

To this front, another legal conflict is added: the international return of the minors to Turkey. That was the country where Icardi resided while playing for Galatasaray, although he has not lived there since May 2026. The overlapping claims keep the relationship between them tense and complicate any possible agreement.

The request for a travel ban seeks to ensure compliance with child support obligations while the situation is not regularized. For Icardi, the measure represents a concrete obstacle to his mobility, especially at a time when he is without a team and needs to resolve his professional future.

Wanda Nara's response comes in a context of strong media exposure for both. Each judicial presentation or public statement generates new repercussions and keeps the issue on the media agenda. The non-compliance with payments since April has become the central argument of the new claim.

A conflict that finds no closure

The lack of agreement on the definitive amount is the knot that holds the fight. As long as there is no firm resolution, the provisional child support remains the only available legal framework and, therefore, the ground where judicial battles are fought.

Icardi, for his part, had previously managed to obtain permits to travel when he needed to. Now, with the accumulated debt and without a stable salary, the possibility of a judge limiting his exit from the country is back on the table. Journalist Naiara Vecchio was the first to anticipate Wanda Nara's move.

The case shows how economic and custody disagreements intersect with the public lives of two media figures. The precautionary measure regarding the images of the daughters and the request for a travel restriction are two sides of the same dispute that still has not found a final point. The request for a travel ban is, for now, Wanda Nara's harshest response to her ex's request.

Meanwhile, the daughters remain at the center of a fight that is being resolved in the courts and on social media. The absence of a definitive agreement on child support and the overlap with the request for international return keep a wound open that has lasted for years.