Multicolored blades: the unconscious fantasy of the nationalization of bodies

They wanted to nationalize private property. They couldn't. They went for the nationalization of genders. And fortunately, they are not succeeding either.

They have the unconscious fantasy that the nationalization of bodies will enable the nationalization of property in the future.

But this will not work for them either. At least not here.

They will not be able to take away our ability to live our sexuality outside of the State, to impose the state’s perspective on us. Which came to establish categories and rewards for those who submit, and persecution and punishment for those who do not.

That’s why, just as I rebelled when they wanted to end the greatest bastion that liberalism gave us and that makes being (private property), I continue to rebel against this control of bodies that the State has proposed in recent years, establishing colorful categories that hide darkness.

The individual against the power of the State

I am enthusiastic about liberalism. Because I believe above all in the individual. I do not need the State to perceive myself as I wish.

On the contrary, I detest when the State comes to impose gender categories, whose purpose, as we already know, is to classify and control.

The only distinction I accept from the State, and it is because it makes our lives better, is the biological distinction between XX and XY. In the case of a crime, for example, the State cannot accept self-perception over chromosomal identity. If an XY commits a crime, it cannot be locked up with an XX. Especially if the crime committed by the XY, who now claims to self-identify as XX, was to violate an XX. The State cannot lock him in a zoo to continue hunting because he becomes a necessary co-participant for the crime to keep happening. Just as the State cannot allow an XY to enter a ring to fight someone who is guaranteed to lose, because he becomes a necessary co-participant for the XY's victory, always the strongest, to happen.

In fact, for me, that is the information that should appear on the ID. Female, male, etc., are data that should not be relevant to the State. The other information is because it is not chosen, it comes with us and is crucial in sports and in punishment for crimes.

Note: I include within the XY the chromosomal variation XXY, which rarely occurs and always comes with a penis that is not decorative.

But regarding the other, what is this about allowing the State, the most powerful of powers, to come and label me in order to limit me?!

Self-perception cannot become an obligation for others

The State has no right to interfere with my gender. Just as I do not have the right to ask the State, which is all of us, to see me as I see myself. Simply because I cannot demand that others see me as I self-perceive. That is plain and simple fascism. Imposing by force on others a perspective they do not have about me will always be authoritarian. And a sign of weakness. If I need to order the other to see me as I see myself, it reveals a very great insecurity regarding what I claim to be.

That’s why the unrestricted right to the life project of others is important. They have the right to see me as they wish, and I have the right to see others as I want. The only limit that exists is equally imposed by criminal law. When someone crosses the line, then the State must intervene. Which, for the convenience of all, must act by punishing those who violate the law.

But while that does not happen, the State should be as little involved in our lives as possible.

It is astonishing that, after the atrocious totalitarian experiences humanity has gone through, there are people who view the nationalization of genders favorably. But well, behind those eyes is the search for a comfortable life that the colorful para-state actors do not want to lose, and they know very well where it is: in the State. Not in the private sector, which has quicksand.

They argue, to avoid entering this sector, that there is discrimination in the private sector. But as far as I know, nothing prevents a trans person from going to ARCA and starting a small business, or signing up to sell their services independently. The conditions are the same for her as for everyone.

From cultural debate to power struggle

It is true that when you enter the private sector, the State immediately comes to enslave you with endless taxes, thus putting into practice the absurd ritual of making you work for Him for 7 to 8 months in exchange for almost nothing, which makes it even more absurd. All so that the colorful para-state actors, among so much militant troop, can receive their salary in exchange for giving moral lessons. That must be why there has not been a single case where the AFIP or ARCA has rejected a trans person prohibiting them from starting their business or working independently. In this, the State, the greatest exploiter and slaver of this era, is very clever. And it is very clear: the more slaves, the better for the State.

And that is why the colorful para-state actors take to the streets. Things that were not said, things that were edited; that is not what is important. Any excuse is good for them to attempt a new coup d'état. This time the helicopter club comes with multicolored blades.

Because they will try again, even if they deny it as always. They need to return the old monarchy to power because they desperately need us, those who generate wealth. To continue exploiting us and thus, in that way, they can continue living as courtiers.

Yes, it is about that, once again. People who self-identify above the Constitution want to continue being supported by the private sector, which they intend to keep exploiting with suffocating taxes, so that the old blue blood becomes colorful blood.

But there is good news: they will not succeed.

We are already aware.

And they know it.

That’s why they are desperate.

They know that the paradigm shift has come to stay and it is impossible for us to return to their multicolored Middle Ages.

At least not in Argentina.