The union rejects the regulation of Uber, Didi, and Cabify, which currently attract more passengers because of their price and efficiency
Compartir:
The recent approval of an ordinance regulating Uber, Didi, and Cabify has triggered a climate of tension in the Córdoba taxi sector. Union representatives replied with warnings and threats of protest, instead of adapting to a scenario of increased competition. Meanwhile, users continue to choose transportation apps for their accessibility and speed.
Although the regulation still needs to be implemented by the Executive, taxi drivers have already declared a state of permanent alert. The main complaint doesn't focus on an alleged lack of clear rules, but rather on losing passengers to platforms with higher demand. This behavior reflects resistance to a change that consumers have already accepted.
The union holds constant assemblies with drivers and permit holders, evaluating possible strike actions against the ordinance. However, the root of the conflict seems to be that users prioritize more affordable rides, without disputes over fares or refusals of routes. In this context, the apps have managed to consolidate a more predictable service than that of traditional taxis.
Miguel Arias, titular del Sindicato de Peones de Taxis
Resistance to digital competition
Miguel Arias, head of the taxi drivers' union, stated that they do not rule out demonstrations after the regulation is implemented. With these statements, they seek to apply political pressure, but in practice the difficulty lies in retaining passengers who have already switched to the apps. The complaints, far from improving the service, focus on stopping those who offer more efficient alternatives.
Users describe that the apps allow greater control over waiting times and final trip costs. In contrast, taxis continue to face issues such as lack of availability during key hours and complaints about refusals of short trips. This difference in daily experience explains why demand has shifted toward digital platforms.
Despite this evidence, the union insists on maintaining the current model through threats of strikes or street protests. That strategy reveals more fear of competition than a willingness to improve service quality. The regulation will set a new scenario where passengers have already clearly shown their choice.
