In an essay written years ago, titled: On the Freedom to Write, the young Mariano Moreno expressed that public opinion was a reliable means to reach the truth: “the truth, like virtue, has in itself its most undeniable apology; through discussion and airing, it appears in all its splendor and brilliance.” He argued that the best way to end social ills was “to give breadth and freedom to public writers, so that they could attack them with full force and without any compassion.”
Now, this freedom of expression that Moreno defended in his youth should not be absolute; for it should not attack either religion or government: “people will lie in the most shameful ignorance if absolute freedom and liberty are not granted to speak on any matter that does not oppose in any way the sacred truths of our august religion and the determinations of the government.” These expressions are compatible with the university Moreno, in contact with the scholastic teaching of Charcas and with the enlightened circle of the canons of the city; which is explained in this passage from that same work: “let us be, once, less partisans of our aged opinions: let us have less pride; let access be given to truth and the introduction of light and enlightenment.”
Manuel Moreno, brother of the national hero, in his Life and Memoirs of Dr. Mariano Moreno explains how oppressive the regime of the Spanish colony was, contrasting it with the freedom of the press established by the First Patriotic Government, inspired by the secretary of the Junta: “A government that is sure of the rectitude of its operations; that recognizes its stability in the affection of its subjects; and that seeks to sincerely correspond to public trust, never shies away from having its actions examined. According to this maxim, the Junta of Buenos Aires voluntarily drew the attention of the people to each of its steps. When in a country freedom of the press is established, the rulers have in it, whether they like it or not, a brake on the usurpations of power and the arbitrariness of their judgments.
Promoting public vigilance over such an important matter is a trait of sincerity, and a heroic desire to voluntarily place oneself in the happy impossibility of failing in their obligations. The people of Buenos Aires were invited by the Junta to be the Censor of their operations; and its members demonstrated, with this frankness, that they neither feared losing their reputation due to the judgments of the masses, nor thought of abandoning their duties…”
Before the Revolution, there were many obstacles to the right to publish ideas through the press. The freedom to write was practically proscribed. Manuel Moreno recalls: “Writings that could circulate in European Dominions were often prohibited in the Americas… Any political essay, any examination of the country's constitution and its resources; in short, the history of the events of the Conquest, and the subsequent ones up to the present time, was forbidden to Americans. Some provisions from the Court expressly prohibited writing on these points in the Colonies.

In any case, the Junta established freedom of the press; but in a limited way. For Manuel Moreno: “reflecting on the circumstances, we will see that this precaution was very wise and much more beneficial than a sudden abolition of the prohibitions on writing; the first, because an alteration of this nature would have degenerated into license the free use of the press, as can be seen in Cadiz; where the people have suddenly gone from absolute repression to the most unlimited freedom; and the second, because the war that the enemies of the cause waged violently required much prudence to undertake unexpected reforms, and it was necessary to avoid the noise and spectacle of any formal change.”
Now, Mariano Moreno acknowledged that the much-talked-about freedom of the press could not be granted overnight: “People cannot be free when it is desired that they be so, but when they can be; and the difficult step from slavery to true and solid freedom must be taken gradually. First, it was necessary to destroy the enemies of the system that was being founded, even at the cost of some deprivation on the part of the people; than to put them in complete exercise of their prerogatives, which the obstinacy of those would only make permanent one day.”
On the other hand, the Junta did not consider it appropriate for the gift of freedom of the press to be enshrined by a recent government; and that moreover was provisional and not constitutive; as was precisely this Governing Junta. They thought that “most of society would not have immediately recognized the benefit that was being provided.” Thus, “without issuing a solemn abolition of the vexations of the press, the Junta began to prepare it through discreet tolerance and made it known to writers that it was time to exercise their talents.
That is why the Junta declared “freedom of the press, although still in terms that might seem diminutive. But Article 1 of this declaration states the following: ‘Every man may freely publish his ideas without prior censorship. Provisions contrary to this freedom are null and void’ [Gazeta de Buenos Ayres, October 26, 1811].









