Far from showing signs of renewal, CGT Córdoba is launching itself to compete for power within Peronism with the same old logic. Under the pretext of "representing what is not represented," they are trying out an old recipe with new spokespersons and the same manual as always. The one chosen to lead the operation is Natalia de la Sota, daughter of the former governor, now allied with Massismo and aligned with the Kirchnerist model.
Ilda Bustos's CGT is promoting a progressive, union-based coalition, although it remains tied to the Peronist apparatus that has controlled these structures for decades. On Saturday, July 26, there will be a plenary session at Canillitas, with influential union leaders who will seek to launch a space focused on "Peronist identity". The goal is to arrive at 2027 with something competitive, although they are already preparing to break into this year's legislative elections.
The new space presents itself as an alternative to Cordobesismo, but it can't hide its Justicialist DNA or its functionality to Kirchnerism. They offer nothing different: they are the same as always, with rehearsed criticisms of the local administration and old resentments against the "Porteño finger." "Broadening the base is difficult, but today in Córdoba we don't have an alternative space to Llaryorismo and Kirchnerism, which still thinks it can control everything from a distance," they say from the CGT, without realizing that their solution is nothing more than a return to the same old thing.

More than renewal, recycling of the same old union leaders and activists
The project is being pushed by historic figures from the Mediterranean CGT such as Ilda Bustos, along with leaders like Salamone, Galán, and Mandakovic. Social and union leaders who orbit Peronist progressivism, with open sympathy for Kirchnerism, are also joining. All of them, they claim, feel disappointed with the local PJ for its "distance" from Peronism's historic values and for prioritizing "employers."
The criticisms of Martín Llaryora do not target his administration, but what they describe as a "convenient ambiguity" regarding the national government. The real target seems closer: Kirchnerism, in its local version, which for this group is insufficient, not because of its ideas, but because of its names. "One of the things that unites us is that we want to distance ourselves from all that," they acknowledge.
Far from any self-criticism for having supported these leaders in the past, now they seek to displace those who do not deliver results. What they once celebrated as "militant leadership," they now denounce as "Porteño verticalism", in a move that doesn't hide its opportunism. The coalition they are leading is nothing more than a re-edition of the same power structure, with the implicit endorsement of union leaders who want to remain central players in the political distribution.










