Grabois and Mengolini are lying: there are no defendants, and their case is falling apart.

Grabois, Mengolini and various media outlets began to spread fake news, alleging that President Milei, Deputy Lemoine, Agustín Romo, Santiago Oría, Fernando Cerimedo and the undersigned, along with many others, had been charged in the case due to their false complaint of threats and other crimes.
Faced with this situation, together with Fernando Cerimedo, we decided to appear in the case file not only to shed light on the delusional claims, but also to confront firsthand the lie spread by Kirchnerism in the midst of a campaign, and to make a series of motions.

Among them, the recusal of both Judge Mirabelli and Prosecutor Domínguez, pursuant to the provisions of art. 55 sec. 8 of the National Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 60 sec. "f" of the Federal Code of Criminal Procedure).
This is because, as recorded in case FSM 27227/2022 (Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 1 of San Isidro, presided over by Dr. Sandra Arroyo Salgado), I have reported both Mirabelli and Domínguez for the crimes set forth in arts. 248 and 269 of the National Penal Code; a complaint that was duly ratified and for which the relevant evidence was attached, notwithstanding the fact that it became public due to its dissemination in multiple traditional media outlets.

In this regard, sec. 8 of art. 55 clearly states that "The judge must recuse himself from hearing the case when one of the following reasons exists: 8) If before the start of the proceedings he has been the accuser or complainant of any of the interested parties, or accused or reported by them."
This particular ground is especially relevant to the case and can't be separated from the consideration of the recusal due to the complaint filed against the Judge and the representative of the Public Prosecutor's Office, since impartiality is undoubtedly compromised.

By definition, the law is clear and doesn't allow for any kind of interpretation: if there is a prior complaint, there is a risk of partiality; and if there is a risk of partiality, there is recusal. This, of course, will mean that another court within the jurisdiction must intervene, the only possible one being the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 1 of San Isidro, presided over by Dr. Sandra Arroyo Salgado, who from now on must carry out the investigation.

Furthermore, aside from this motion, this is a case with very little activity and in which absolutely no one has been charged. There is only a request for a letter rogatory for the social network "X" to provide private data of the accounts of the President, other officials and several civilians, ultimately ordered by Judge Mirabelli but, given the motions, together with the request for annulment, it has been virtually frozen.

The lie of Grabois and Mengolini, without a doubt, sought to fuel an electoral campaign that appears very poor and meager for Kirchnerism, attempting to generate some kind of shock effect that, besides being irrelevant, turned out to be a crude scam for their own audience.
Now it will be up to the courts to solve these issues, while Grabois and Mengolini will have to wait for a total and absolute defeat for their twisted ambitions to be consummated.