The prosecutor's office considers that these elements strengthen the hypothesis of a deliberate asset stripping maneuver. In addition to the use of funds, the aim would have been to consolidate a competing venture without the proper legal authorization. The documentation will be key to defining responsibilities and upcoming procedural measures.
Meanwhile, the complainants insist that provisions of the Companies Law were violated, especially regarding unfair competition. D’Alessandro's continued status as a partner activates new legal proceedings. "This is not a family conflict but strictly a corporate one," said attorney Pedro Despouy.

Legal breaches in corporate management alleged
The complaint highlights that several decisions would have been made without proper board approval. Among them are participation in a competing company and the omission of key information to partners. These actions could violate rules set forth in the Companies Law, such as those contemplated in its Articles 157, 272, 273, and 274.
It is questioned that D’Alessandro would have continued operating on behalf of the group despite his removal as administrator. This worsens the legal situation, since he would remain a partner without formally disassociating himself. He is also attributed responsibilities that would compromise Fono Bus's financial health.
The complainants' attorney is considering expanding the initial filing in light of new evidence that may arise. They believe there was a planned strategy to weaken the company for personal gain. The prosecutor's office is now analyzing whether a criminal offense is established for cases of disloyal or fraudulent management.
D’Alessandro's associates maintain that there were no illicit maneuvers or misuse of company funds. They state that the acquisition of El Quebrachal SRL was a private transaction, unrelated to Fono Bus, and that the disputed actions are due to commercial disagreements, not crimes.














