They discovered that Biden's signature was automated and could nullify all his decrees.

Towards the end of his term, former Democratic President Joe Biden was embroiled in growing criticism over his health status, especially after a debate with Donald Trump in 2024, which revealed an evident cognitive decline.

This led many to question whether Biden was in full possession of his mental faculties, which was widely acknowledged by Democrats, albeit in a veiled manner.

Faced with this situation, the Democratic Party forced his resignation, pushing the infamous Kamala Harris as his successor, which many saw as a maneuver of dubious legitimacy.

In this context, the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project has investigated the use of the "autopen" or signing machine in Biden's presidency, discovering that most of the official documents signed by him during his term were actually signed by this machine.

This finding has caused serious doubts about whether Biden was truly aware of the legal and political decisions made in his name.

The use of the autopen is not new, as it has been employed by U.S. presidents since the 1950s, and it is considered legal as long as the president has authorized the signature.

However, the problem lies in whether Biden, due to his evident cognitive decline, was aware of the decisions reflected in those documents.

The Republican Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, confessed that Biden did not remember signing an executive order related to the detention of liquefied natural gas exports. This sowed doubts about the authenticity of the signatures and whether Biden had really approved them.

Missouri Attorney General, Andrew Bailey, has demanded that the Department of Justice investigate whether Biden's cognitive decline allowed unelected officials to run the government without presidential oversight. If it is confirmed that Biden was not making the decisions, every legal act signed in his name could be considered void.

Additionally, the Heritage Foundation's investigation revealed that Biden's advisors attempted to prevent the president from meeting in person with other leaders, limiting his ability to make decisions on his own.

Even some Democratic Party officials have admitted that, in reality, presidential decisions were being made by his staff, his wife, and his criminal son, Hunter Biden. This reinforces the hypothesis that the president was not governing effectively.

The evidence from the investigation includes multiple examples of official documents signed with the same autopen, which reinforces the suspicion that Biden's signature did not reflect his personal consent.

Fox News examined more than 20 executive orders signed by Biden between 2021 and 2024 and found that all had the same signature, while Biden's signature on the announcement of his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race was significantly different.

This fact has been interpreted as further evidence that Biden was not directly involved in making important decisions.

The use of the autopen has been a topic of debate in U.S. politics, especially when combined with concerns about a president's mental health.

In Biden's case, criticism about his mental capacity increased in 2024, following his disastrous performance in the only presidential debate against Trump.

During this event, Biden made numerous mistakes and showed clear signs of cognitive decline, which led many, including traditional Democratic allies, to call for him to withdraw from the presidential race in favor of a younger generation.

The situation became even more complicated when, in a meeting with Mike Johnson, Biden did not remember signing an executive order affecting natural gas exports, which left Johnson with serious doubts about who was really governing the country.

These concerns were reinforced by the letter sent by Attorney General Bailey to the Department of Justice, requesting an investigation into whether Biden's staff had been making radical political decisions without the president's knowledge.

The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project has insisted that it is essential to determine who controlled the autopen during Biden's presidency and what control mechanisms existed to ensure that the decisions reflected the president's will.

Given the political and legal situation, this issue could have profound implications on the legitimacy of the decisions made during his term.

Growing skepticism about Biden's mental health and the use of the autopen to sign official documents has caused a strong reaction on social media, especially among conservatives, who correctly question whether the executive orders and other presidential actions were truly approved by Biden or if they were the result of his staff's intervention.