With a pamphleteering tone, Philosophy and Arts at UNC defended CFK and attacked the republican system without legal arguments
Nuevo
Agregar La Derecha Diario en
Compartir:
The Philosophy and Arts Faculties of UNC published institutional statements in support of Cristina Kirchner. The statements describe the Supreme Court's ruling as "a political proscription" and attack the Argentine judicial system. For many people in Córdoba, this is another example of partisan alignment with Kirchnerism.
On social media, reactions came quickly. Many pointed out the use of state-funded academic spaces for partisan purposes. The tone of the statements caused rejection even among sectors critical of the national government.
Both faculties published their statements from official accounts. This sparked a heated discussion about the politicization of educational institutions. UNC is once again at the center of the debate over the ideological use of its structures.
Foto aerea de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Statements with a militant tone and no legal basis
The text from the Faculty of Philosophy refers to historical events such as the 1955 bombing. It claims that the conviction of CFK is part of a "fierce attack on the democratic order." It doesn't present legal arguments that contradict the Supreme Court's decision.
Meanwhile, the Faculty of Arts targets Javier Milei, the media, and the "dispossession of retirees." The statement accuses the Judiciary of violating the rule of law and blocking cases such as the attempted assassination of CFK. The text deliberately omits the proven facts in the public works corruption trial.
Comunicados institucionales de las facultades de Filosofía y Artes de la UNC
Independent academic sectors expressed surprise at the belligerent language. Both statements mix lawfare theories with criticism of the current national government. The result is a declaration closer to a pamphlet than to a serious institutional stance.
Public rejection was heard on social media
The publication of the statements on official accounts provoked a flood of criticism from students and citizens. "Why is politics being discussed at the faculty? Don't tarnish education," wrote one user. Another comment stated: "Our green building is falling apart, there's dampness in the classrooms (...) we don't have the minimum comfort to attend classes. Just saying, in case anyone cares!"
The criticism focused on the use of public resources for militant purposes. "I totally reject this kind of measure. Employees of public entities must serve the people who pay their salaries," said another message. "Cristina in prison, end of story," summarized one user, reflecting the exhaustion with the defense of convicted leaders.
Campus Digital de la UNC
Silence on corruption and contempt for the republic
None of the texts mention the reasons for CFK's conviction. The former president was found guilty of defrauding the state and directing contracts in favor of Lázaro Báez. This was a unanimous decision confirmed by the Court.
The lack of mention of the crimes reflects the partisan bias of the statements. More concerning is that educational institutions vindicate convicted leaders. This calls into question the republican commitment of sectors that claim to defend democracy.
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades de la UNC
Voices from the university and legal fields warned about the seriousness of these statements. They question the use of official channels to legitimize corruption. They call for universities to maintain their autonomy without becoming spokespersons for partisan interests.
