Félix Ajpi indicated that Evo Morales's egomania is worse than that of Hitler or Mussolini.

The senator from the Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS), Félix Ajpi, harshly criticized the creation of the political organization "Evo Pueblo" in the Cochabamba tropics. He considered that this act by Morales reflects an unprecedented egolatry in world political history. He emphasized that neither Hitler nor Mussolini, known for their cult of personality, went this far, his statements have caused great controversy.

Ajpi called Evo Morales a "human wreck" for his attempt to found a party with his own name. He expressed his surprise at what he considers an extreme act of political narcissism. He recalled that Morales had already been criticized for his desire to perpetuate himself in power and also mentioned that these actions divide the population.

The organization "Evo Pueblo" was approved at a congress of the "evista" wing of MAS in Villa Tunari, Cochabamba. The new political acronym was chosen by the majority of attendees, and its colors are blue, white, and green. The decision to include Morales's name in the acronym caused polarized reactions, as it is a flagrant cult of personality.

Ajpi regretted having supported the former dictator Evo Morales when he was starting in politics. He noted that in the 90s they trusted him as a true popular leader. However, he criticized his current attitude and eagerness for prominence and ironically said that, in the future, maybe he will also found "Félix Pueblo."

The comparison with Hitler and Mussolini was one of the most striking points of his speech. Both leaders were known for establishing authoritarian regimes, but Ajpi highlighted that neither of them founded a party with their own name. Morales's actions would have far surpassed what both genocidal leaders did during the 20th century.

The followers of the coca leader have indicated that the new party seeks to consolidate itself as the alternative for future elections. Evo Morales was ironically proclaimed as the "natural leader of indigenous peoples" and declared the sole candidate. These decisions reinforce the personalist image within the movement.

Don't the evistas see anything wrong with the name?

Wilfredo Chávez, Morales's lawyer, defended the creation of "Evo Pueblo" and assured that it is not a cult of personality. He argued that the decision was made unanimously at the congress. According to Morales's followers, that name indicates that the former dictator has listened to his followers' request to return to politics.

The "arcista" wing of MAS recently removed Morales's "natural leadership" from its statutes, the statutes established that he was the absolute leader. This happened at the congress that the arcistas held in La Paz. Meanwhile, Morales's followers seek to consolidate their own political space.

Morales's reaction to Ajpi's criticism was not long in coming. Through his social media, Morales shamelessly defended the creation of the party, assuring that "Evo Pueblo" is a reflection of the popular will. He also reiterated his intention to run for president again.

The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) still has to rule on the legality of "Evo Pueblo." For the party to be recognized, it must meet the established legal requirements, such as collecting signatures from members. This process could take several months, which could hinder the aspirations of the one accused of pedophilia.

Ajpi concluded his intervention by assuring that history will judge those who cling to power. He reiterated that Morales has lost his way and emphasized that politics should serve the people and not one person. Morales's actions show the complete opposite.

Morales's decision to name his new party "Evo Pueblo" reflects a colossal egolatry that goes beyond mere political strategy. By putting his own name on the organization, he reveals his eagerness for prominence and desire to be the absolute center of the movement. This act demonstrates that his political vision has been reduced to a personal cult, where his figure is more important than the ideas or the country's well-being.