Ministry of Justice: More State, Less Justice

Ministry of Justice: More State, Less Justice
porEditorial Team
Uruguay

The proposed Ministry of Justice will only increase the State's bureaucratic apparatus, and will reduce resources and powers from the Judiciary.


The President of the Republic announced his intention to create a ministry of justice and human rights in our country. A few months ago, the current Deputy Secretary of the Presidency, Jorge Díaz, defended the creation of the said ministry, understanding that this would be “key to the country's institutionality”. But the question we must ask ourselves is whether we really need more State to have more justice. Often, what politics presents as a solution ends up being part of the problem or aggravating it, something that we have been used to for decades.

The real problem of the judicial system is not ministerial, we have lengthy processes, saturation of court files, lack of budget (in any case this is not a solution in itself, fair, that is to say, since there are plenty of examples that a greater allocation of resources has been irrelevant to the improvement of the service, such as education and the police) some in which equality before the law is violated, we have excess regulations that make enforcing the law a daunting task and that results in the fact that judges, become, in fact and unintentionally, bureaucratic agents who control the offices of the executive and parliament, instead of fulfilling the enormous and vital function of imparting justice, that is, of giving

everyone their own.

But the problem we have is not being corrected with more red tape.

The government's idea is to create a new ministry that coordinates policies related to justice, human rights, the prison system, public defender and access to justice, among others, given that there are multiple dispersed organizations and this generates inefficiencies. In other words, a kind of governing body that is a synthesis of what is dispersed and can grant uniformity

of action.
Advertisement
Advertisement

It is also alleged that all Mercosur countries have a Ministry of Justice, and that Uruguay should “modernize its institutions”. However, just because something exists in other countries doesn't mean it's a good idea. Many neighboring countries have price controls, regulations, bankrupt public companies, and failed retirement systems, and that doesn't mean we should copy

them.

In Uruguay, in the last forty years, new ministries have been created in every government that has passed: the Ministry of Tourism, Housing, Social Development, the Environment, and now the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights. The size of the State has not stopped growing since the democratic reopening, and this is not free, it has a direct impact on people's pockets, because capital is consumed from the only sector that generates wealth, which is the private sector, to finance this expenditure that has not served and is useless. And the justice ministry is no exception.

The problem of the lack of coordination that is argued to justify its creation is precisely created by the excess of bureaucracy, which generates more regulations, more control mechanisms, more spending and which ultimately generates new deficiencies and new problems that take us to the starting point.

Every time a new ministry and a new public office are created, however “temporary” it is here to stay, it is the closest thing to eternal life you will ever see on earth. This was the case with the Mides, and so it was with the solidarity wages of

the past government.

There is another even more delicate point, which has to do with the separation of powers. Although the creation of a ministry will not replace the jurisdictional work of the Judiciary (that is, the task of judging and enforcing what has been tried), the creation of a ministry of justice lends itself to bad thinking, since it would lend or increase political influence over the judicial system. This creates a very clear risk of politicizing justice. And politicized justice is the beginning of the end of the rule of

law.

It is curious that now, multicolored people are opposed to the creation of this ministry, when their respective government programs explicitly included the creation of a ministry of justice and human rights. Thus, the National Party's program envisaged the “Creation of a ministry of justice and human rights, to better centralize and coordinate justice and human rights policies, which can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the system”. For its part, in that of the Colorado Party, in point 6. of its program, called “Judicial Operation”, it specifically provided for the “Creation of a Ministry of Justice and Human Rights

”.

But the proof of nine that the creation of this ministry is disastrous for the republic emerges from the argument currently used for the above-mentioned opposition: the person who would most likely be the ministry of that portfolio, Dr. Diaz, does not deserve trust. In other words, more important than the institutional framework is its human support. In other words, it becomes clear that whoever heads the ministry can negatively influence jurisdictional work, ergo, institutionality is not for them a refuge of guarantees, but rather a tailor-made suit that they are only willing to make if the tailor is to their liking.

There is a pattern that is repeated throughout history in this blessed country. When something doesn't work, the response of the political system is always the same. They create a new agency, a new ministry, a new body, and thus they expand the employment agency to accommodate their friends, family and

militants.

But the State is not corrected by enlarging it. Liberals have known this for centuries. The problem of the modern State is not its weakness or its inefficiency, it is its permanent expansion that impoverishes people. Justice will improve when laws are clear and equal for all, processes are agile and the State stops intervening in everything

.

Therefore, it is necessary to remember something fundamental: Political power always tends to expand and, therefore, the cost of our freedom is its eternal vigilance.


Noticias relacionadas

Uruguayan feminism: A totalitarian farce that suffocates freedom

Uruguayan feminism: A totalitarian farce that suffocates freedom

An unserious request, 318 million in debt to change nothing

An unserious request, 318 million in debt to change nothing

The Recession of Simple Things: The Uruguayan Economy on the Way to the Hecatombe

The Recession of Simple Things: The Uruguayan Economy on the Way to the Hecatombe

Uruguayans lost 89 million dollars due to the government's new fuel calculation

Uruguayans lost 89 million dollars due to the government's new fuel calculation

Uruguay should copy the Paraguayan tax regime to break the impasse

Uruguay should copy the Paraguayan tax regime to break the impasse

The Broad Front collects medicines for Cuba in violation of the Pharmacy Act

The Broad Front collects medicines for Cuba in violation of the Pharmacy Act

La Derecha Diario logo
ESX logoInstagram logoYouTube logoTikTok logo
ARGENTINABOLIVIAECUADORISRAELMEXICOURUGUAY
  • ESXInstagramYouTubeTikTok
  • Secciones
  • ARGENTINA
  • BOLIVIA
  • ECUADOR
  • ISRAEL
  • MEXICO
  • URUGUAY
  • Países
  • La Derecha Diario logoLA DERECHA DIARIO
  • La Derecha Diario México logoLA DERECHA DIARIO MÉXICO
  • La Derecha Diario Uruguay logoLA DERECHA DIARIO URUGUAY
  • La Derecha Diario Ecuador logoLA DERECHA DIARIO ECUADOR
  • La Derecha Diario Bolívia logoLA DERECHA DIARIO BOLÍVIA
  • La Derechadiario República Dominicana logoLA DERECHADIARIO REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA
  • La Derecha Diario Israel logoLA DERECHA DIARIO ISRAEL
  • El Diario
  • QUIENES SOMOS
  • AUTORES
  • PUBLICIDAD
  • DONAR
La Derecha Diario logo
TwitterInstagramYouTubeTikTok

Nosotros

  • Quienes Somos
  • Autores
  • Donar

Privacidad

  • Protección de datos
  • Canales
  • Sitemap

Contacto

  • info@derechadiario.com.ar
PUBLICIDAD