The Milo case returned to the public debate after new judicial details became known about the family dispute between Claude Staicos and Alexandra Sabio.
However, far from the narrative spread on social networks by sectors close to the mother, the documentation published in La Verdad de Milo maintains that it was Justice itself that decided to grant unilateral care of the child to his father after years of judicial conflict.
Alexandra Sabio was convicted of obstructing the link. One of the
central points of the file is that the Criminal Justice of Neuquén found Alexandra guilty. Aware of the crime of aggravated contact impediment, for having maintained for more than five years a plan to prevent Milo from seeing his father. According to the documentation released, she was sentenced to six months' suspended imprisonment and rules of conduct were set for her
.The resolution also maintains that the mother violated the rights of the child in a “serious and sustained” manner, an argument that was later also used in the family jurisdiction.
Justice granted unilateral care to Claude Staicos
After multiple warnings and documented breaches, the civil courts decided to grant Claude Staicos unilateral care of the child, allowing for the establishment of a regime of communication with the mother later. According to the site, the measure was taken after the exhaustion of mediations, subpoenas and previous warnings
.The judicial operation in the kindergarten and the controversy over the restitution
One of the most talked about episodes of the case occurred when the Justice executed the return of the child in the kindergarten where Milo attended
