Deputy Torrez stated that he doesn't respond to Doria Medina's interests, assuring that he and Rojas act as legitimate representatives of CC. He argued that allowing a breakup without legal control would affect parliamentary representation. In his view, MAS could benefit if CC's caucus fragments, and therefore he considers it essential to preserve the original alliance.
Despite these statements, both deputies signed a document with adherence to Unidad Nacional weeks ago. The signature was made along with other legislators aligned with Doria Medina.
This fact was used by Libre to reinforce their thesis of a coordinated action. However, Doria Medina categorically rejected any link with the challenge. He said he doesn't know the signatories nor has he given any instruction.
The leader of Unidad Nacional accused Libre of creating imaginary enemies and stated that he doesn't intend to win elections through administrative means. He also asked his detractors to avoid speculation without evidence. He rejected the accusations spread by Libre's spokespersons.
Monasterio replied more harshly after those statements. He accused Doria Medina of hypocrisy and double standards. He showed photos of the deputies with the businessman as proof of political coordination.
The TSE now has the task of defining the validity of the Libre alliance and must rule in the coming days on the challenge. The decision could redefine the electoral map heading into the general elections. The ruling will be key to measuring institutional solidity in the current climate of polarization.
This dispute also highlights the fragility of pacts between opposition leaders. The breakup of the unity bloc has led to an open war between its former members. Cross accusations and legal threats mark a new stage of the conflict.
