The Prosecutor's Office appealed to the Chamber of Cassation, where Villar insisted on his request for 12 years. Nevertheless, the court upheld the initial ruling. Faced with this decision, the prosecutor resorted to the Supreme Court through an extraordinary appeal, which was rejected. Now, with that avenue exhausted, he presents a complaint appeal directly to the highest court.
According to Villar, the resolution of the Chamber of Cassation lacks valid grounds and merely rejects the Prosecutor's arguments without due analysis. In his presentation, he argued that the sentence presents dogmatic assertions, isolated evaluations, and omission of key evidence, making it an invalid decision with various grounds of arbitrariness.










