
A USAID official pleaded guilty to massive fraud and bribery
At least one official from the government foreign aid agency pleaded guilty to fraud involving more than USD 500 million
On June 13, 2025, the United States Department of Justice announced that four individuals, including a federal official from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and three businessmen, pleaded guilty to participating in a bribery scheme involving more than $550 million in federal contracts.
The main official involved is Roderick Watson, 57 years old, a Maryland resident and former USAID contracting officer. Watson pleaded guilty to bribery of a public official and faces up to 15 years in prison, with sentencing scheduled for October 6.

The other three defendants are businessmen who conspired with Watson:
- Walter Barnes (46 years old, Maryland), owner of Vistant (PM Consulting Group LLC), pleaded guilty to conspiracy to bribe a public official and securities fraud.
- Darryl Britt (64 years old, Florida), owner of Apprio Inc., pleaded guilty to conspiracy to bribe a public official.
- Paul Young (62 years old, Maryland), president of a subcontractor linked to both companies, also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to bribe a public official.
Each of the businessmen faces up to five years in prison, with sentencing scheduled between July and October 2025.
The scheme began in 2013, when Watson used his influence within USAID to award federal contracts without competition to Apprio, Britt's company, in exchange for bribes.

Apprio was a beneficiary of the federal SBA 8(a) program, designed to help companies owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, allowing them to obtain exclusive contracts without bidding.
When Apprio "graduated" from the 8(a) program and became ineligible, the scheme changed: Vistant, Barnes's company and Apprio's subcontractor, became the new beneficiary of direct contracts. Between 2018 and 2022, Watson continued manipulating the contracting process to favor Vistant, receiving a wide range of bribes in return.
The illicit payments included:
- Cash
- Laptops
- Luxury tickets to NBA games
- A wedding at a country club
- Mortgage down payments
- Cell phones
- Jobs for relatives
Shell companies, fake payrolls, and fraudulent invoices were used to cover up the bribes. Paul Young acted as an intermediary to conceal the payments, channeling funds through his company.

The scheme allowed Apprio and Vistant to obtain at least 14 main USAID contracts, valued at more than $550 million. As part of the judicial agreement, both companies accepted criminal responsibility and signed three-year deferred prosecution agreements (DPA) with the Department of Justice.
Although the calculation of fines under federal guidelines established much higher penalties:
- Apprio was supposed to pay $51.6 million, but it was reduced to $500,000 after showing financial incapacity.
- Vistant was supposed to pay $86.4 million, but will pay only $100,000 for similar reasons.
Both companies must cooperate with the government, implement ethics and compliance programs, and report regularly on their progress.
Officials from the Department of Justice, the FBI, the IRS, and the USAID Office of Inspector General strongly condemned the scheme. Matthew Galeotti, from DOJ, stated that the case represents a "violation of public trust" and an exploitation of the federal system.
Other officials highlighted the negative impact of corruption on the credibility of programs intended to help disadvantaged small businesses.

This scandal adds to the historical criticism of USAID for its management and transparency. Recently, the businessman and former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Elon Musk, under the Donald Trump administration, led drastic cuts to the agency.
Musk and Trump have labeled USAID as corrupt, with Trump stating in February that "USAID's spending is mostly corrupt or ridiculous."
As part of the reform led by DOGE, more than $8 billion in funding was eliminated and most of the staff and USAID contractors were dismissed, in an attempt to dismantle the agency.

More posts: