Viviana Canosa: 'I have recordings and things that compromise many people'

Viviana Canosa caused controversy again by speaking in depth about her complaint against Lizy Tagliani. This time, she did it through a live call on the show  "Sálvese quien pueda" hosted by Yanina Latorre on América,  and offered unprecedented information about the legal conflict that is about to begin.

The journalist stated that after her strong editorial, many people started contacting her.  "A lot of the people I talked about, without naming them, are calling me. There are many people who feel alluded to," she said in conversation with Yanina Latorre.

When asked why she decided to report Tagliani at this time, Canosa replied frankly:  "It was something natural, I didn't think about it. It didn't add anything to me, I didn't know where to start telling it."

The complaint, according to Canosa, is ready to move forward

The host detailed that she worked intensively over the weekend to organize all the documentation. "I have everything organized,"  she stated firmly. She also made it clear that she doesn't feel fear: "I'm not afraid. I believe that sometimes one is an instrument to communicate things."

The host of  Viviana en Vivo  (El Trece) confessed that she has "tapes and things that compromise a lot of people" and that is what she will present to the prosecutor's office in Comodoro Py on Wednesday the 16th.

[IMAGE]{965259}[/IMAGE]

With these words, Canosa implied that her role as a communicator was key to daring to expose what she considers necessary.

Canosa's lawyer clarified the legal status of the conflict

During the same program,  Viviana Canosa's lawyer explained the current legal landscape of the complaint.

He assured that so far no precautionary measure had been filed against his client or against the channel. "There is no precautionary measure filed. The channel is not notified, and neither are we," he stated.

He also revealed that they only received three document letters, although he clarified that this "doesn't imply anything" at the judicial level.

Finally, the lawyer referred to the possibility of a gag order: "I understand that this is not going to happen, and if it does happen, we will appeal,"  he stated emphatically.