The Great Homeland Trap, Luisa González and her dangerous closeness to Maduro

The recent letter from Luisa González to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has sparked controversy in Ecuador. In the document, the candidate of the Citizen Revolution proposes facilitating the arrival and naturalization of Venezuelan migrants if she assumes the presidency. The proposal has been criticized by various sectors, who question both the substance and the form of the message.

González expressed her desire to facilitate the reception of Venezuelans, especially those who have been "brutally expelled" from the United States. However, her proposal to remove immigration restrictions and facilitate naturalization has raised doubts. In a country facing unemployment and pressure on public services, a policy without controls could overwhelm the state's capacity and generate internal tensions.

Additionally, this approach reflects a vision typical of 21st-century socialism, which has proven unsustainable in countries like Venezuela. There, millions have fled due to the economic and social crises caused by statist and absolute control policies.

A proposal that revives the socialist model

González also mentioned the idea of a "universal citizenship," which has provoked more criticism. Although solidarity is important, experts warn that immigration policies must be based on the country's reality. The lack of controls could increase pressure on basic services such as health, education, and security.

This idealistic discourse, typical of radical socialism, could end up affecting the most vulnerable sectors, as has happened in other countries in the region.

Another point of concern is her reference to working in coordination with the Citizen Revolution bloc in the National Assembly. This has been interpreted as an intention to align Ecuador with the Chavista model.

Analysts warn that this could put the country's sovereignty at risk and open the door to policies dictated by external ideological interests. The closeness to authoritarian and socialist regimes could isolate Ecuador and replicate models that have already proven their failure.

The letter has also been criticized for its tone and recipient. By addressing Maduro directly and speaking of strengthening the "Patria Grande," González projects an image of closeness to one of the most questioned regimes in the region. This could affect Ecuador's international image and generate diplomatic tensions.

Additionally, González raises the possibility of modifying decrees related to immigration and foreign policy. This intention has been seen as an irresponsible opening, without considering the medium and long-term consequences. A stance that seems to ignore the lessons left by the crises caused by socialist policies in the region.

Security experts have also warned about the risks of allowing unrestricted entry. There is concern about the possibility that criminal networks or elements linked to insecurity could take advantage of lax policies to enter the country. This could exacerbate crime problems, just as Ecuador faces serious challenges in this area.

Additionally, some sectors question whether González's proposal prioritizes foreign interests over local needs.Improvised policies could further destabilize the already delicate social and economic balance.

The experience of other countries governed by socialist models has shown how the lack of controls has facilitated the expansion of organized crime and the loss of state control over citizen security.

Luisa González's letter to Nicolás Maduro opens a deep debate about Ecuador's future in immigration and diplomatic matters. Solidarity is important, but political decisions must be responsible.

Radical socialism, in its attempt to appear inclusive, has repeatedly proven to be a source of crisis and regression. Ecuador needs clear proposals, based on stability and development. Repeating failed models is not the way to ensure the well-being of Ecuadorians.