Mexico City, February 18, 2025. Miguel Ángel Yunes Márquez surprised by leaving his membership in the Partido Acción Nacional (PAN) and joining Morena. His decision coincides with the ruling party's massive affiliation campaign, which seeks to consolidate its power in key states like Veracruz.
The change not only redefines the local political landscape. It also confirms that Morena has no qualms about adding allies, regardless of their party history.
Opportunistic affiliation
Yunes was expelled from PAN after supporting the Judicial Reform promoted by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. His quick incorporation into Morena reflects the lack of ideological principles in Mexican politics.
For Morena, adding Yunes represents a strategic move. The ruling party seeks to strengthen its hegemony in the Congress, even if it means welcoming figures who were once its opponents.
Support for Yunes has been defended by Luisa María Alcalde. The Secretary of the Interior assured that there is no problem with his incorporation, despite the corruption allegations against his family.
Divided reactions
The decision caused discontent within the PAN. Ricardo Anaya, PAN coordinator in the Senate, described Yunes's joining as a betrayal. He also criticized Morena's strategy of adding allies without principles.
From the ruling party, they justify the move as a legislative tactic to secure key votes in future reforms.
Impact in the Senate
With his arrival at Morena, Yunes has been appointed President of the Finance and Public Credit Commission. With this move, the ruling party expands its control over Congress.
Mexican politics is becoming increasingly predictable. Ideological loyalties have been forgotten, and political convenience dictates the rules of the game.
Strategist or simple opportunist?
Morena continues to absorb figures of all colors. In light of this, citizens wonder: who do politicians who change parties according to their convenience really represent?
This episode confirms that Mexican politics remains marked by opportunism. The lack of ideological commitment generates uncertainty among voters, who increasingly trust less in those who claim to represent them.
