The Church warned about the judicial election: 'A bad judge can imprison innocents.'

In an uncommon but significant stance, the Catholic Church in Mexico raised its voice about the election of judges. It warned that "a bad judge can imprison innocents," highlighting the risks of hasty or poorly founded decisions.

The Church spoke out against the politicization of the Judiciary

The message not only points to judicial errors but also to the urgency of reflecting on how the Judiciary is being reconfigured. In a context of reforms driven from power, the warning takes on special weight.

The criticism was published in Desde la Fe, the official media of the Archdiocese of Mexico City. It emerged in the midst of an electoral campaign, when the ruling party promotes changes in the Judiciary. For the Church, the risk is subjecting justice to a political vision.

 

The Church called for voting responsibly and being well-informed. It warned that not only public positions are being elected, but also those who will administer justice. It reminded that a bad judge can ruin a life, and that should not be taken lightly.

The Church distanced itself and called for respect for institutionalism

Although the message doesn't directly mention Morena, the context is evident. It is published in the midst of the ruling party's campaign to bring the appointment of judges and magistrates to consultation. This proposal has caused strong controversy.

Various academic, business, and international sectors have expressed their concern. They warn that this measure concentrates power and weakens institutions. For them, the reform puts the democratic balance at risk.

Warned about the consequences of politicizing the courts

The Church stated that it will not allow its media to be used for electoral purposes, reinforcing its neutrality and commitment to democratic institutions.

The Church's stance contrasts with the government's discourse. While there is talk of "democratizing" the Judiciary, the facts reveal another intention. Checks and balances are weakened, and critical voices are marginalized.

Uncomfortable judges are subject to pressure and harassment. Instead of valuing legal preparation, political loyalty is rewarded. Thus, justice runs the risk of being essentialized by power.

The Church condemned judicial populism

The Archdiocese warned that justice should not be subjected to ideologies or electoral purposes. It pointed out that a country without independent judges is vulnerable to partisan interests. Judicial impartiality is key to preserving the institutional balance.

It also reminded that voting at the polls is not enough. It is essential to understand the consequences of handing over the Judiciary to political control. Justice turned into a tool of power loses its democratic sense.

The Church's warning gains strength in the face of the political use of justice, the institutions cease to serve the common good.