Extremely serious: Yamandú Orsi blindly commits the Uruguayan people before the UN

The President of the Republic will travel to Seville, Spain, to participate in the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) of the United Nations Organization. It will take place between June 30 and July 3 and aims to reform the rules of the global financial game and implement concrete measures to obtain the necessary economic resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) established in the 2030 Agenda.

This is how the UN puts it: "FFD4 offers a unique opportunity to reform financing at all levels, including supporting the reform of the international financial architecture and solving the financial challenges that prevent the urgent investment push for the SDGs."

Last Tuesday, June 3, in a virtual meeting, Yamandú Orsi stated before the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, that "Uruguay's commitment[is]not only to attend, but to sign the agreements and commit[itself]to whatever emerges from that international conference."

These statements are extremely serious and all the media turned a blind eye: how can a head of state commit the entire Uruguayan people "to whatever emerges"? Accepting to sign agreements in advance and saying so publicly with such lightness is a terrible act of political recklessness and institutional irresponsibility. In clear terms: Yamandú Orsi completely surrenders national sovereignty and disrespects the entire Uruguayan people.

You may also be interested in...This analysis on how the pay-as-you-go system has also been used to commit the country without public debate.

Global tax regime

To get warmed up, on April 28, 2025, within the framework of the 2025 UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Forum on Financing for Development and the 4th Preparatory Committee for FFD4, UN News published the article "Financing for development faces hard truths."

Secretary-General António Guterres warned about donors' failure to fulfill commitments, the increase in trade barriers, and the suffering of an annual financing deficit of 4 trillion dollars. However, he stated that the greatest and most dangerous problem facing the agenda lies in the fact that "global collaboration is being actively questioned".

He also called for the creation of new sources of financing, strengthening collaboration with the private sector, and moving toward an "inclusive and effective global tax regime". This would constitute a complete loss of fiscal sovereignty for nations. States would no longer have the freedom to define their tax system according to their economic, social, and cultural priorities, becoming subordinate to global rules defined by multilateral organizations. Accepting a global tax regime means giving up governing in the national interest to submit to external interests, unrelated to local realities.

Along the same lines, Bob Rae, president of ECOSOC, openly stated that "There is no national solution; there can only be a global solution". This statement reveals the ideological core of globalism: dissolving the sovereignty of nation-states in favor of supranational structures that no one democratically elected.

You may also be interested in...This article on how the myth of the protective state hides a looting machine disguised as institutionality.

Not only Frente Amplio responds to foreign interests

Let us remember that for more than 70 years, the UN has had a fierce influence on decisions that condition the lives of Uruguayans. However, there was a turning point under the previous nationalist government that perceives itself as "right-wing."

On September 9, 2022, under the government of globalist Luis Lacalle Pou, they marked Uruguayan territory more strongly by inaugurating the UN House in Montevideo. Located in the historic Palacio Serratosa building, the following operate: the Office of the Resident Coordinator, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Human Rights Advisor of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), and Global Compact.

Dozens of political actors aligned with the 2030 agenda participated in the inaugural event, such as Javier García—current candidate for the National Party's board, who seeks to wage a strange cultural battle against Frente Amplio—; Yamandú Orsi, then Intendant of Canelones, and Beatriz Argimón, the current Frente Amplio government’s designated UNESCO ambassador.

Argimón, Vice President of the Republic at that time, was "awarded" by handing over the National Flag to the Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations, Jean Pierre Lacroix, and with the closing speech, where she made it clear that all Uruguayan politicians are globalists: "all political parties have been in power and United Nations programs have worked with all of us regardless of the government in office."

In Uruguay all political parties are globalists

Recently, in November 2024, the United Nations/ANEP Model was implemented under the administration of Colorado Party leader Virginia Cáceres. 130 students (from all over the country) were subjected, in a kind of simulation, to align themselves with the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda.

In that context, the former president of ANEP stated that CODICEN was going to discuss the possibility of implementing, for 2025, the United Nations/ANEP Model in one high school per department: "it will be a pilot experience to be developed throughout the country. We have made that commitment to bring the proposal to the Council."

Meanwhile, the former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, also from the Colorado Party, Nicolás Albertoni, highlighted the initiative and celebrated that "today's youth are being trained with a global vision".

You may also be interested in...This article on how public funds are allocated to ideological events such as the Menstrual Visibility Days.

Global governance

International organizations are increasingly conditioning the economic freedom of different countries. The sovereignty of nation-states is increasingly diminished and cultural hegemony expands through the global agenda.

The entire Uruguayan political spectrum promotes the false narrative that these institutions have the "noble" intention of solving the common challenges facing humanity through spaces of "global cooperation."

Frente Amplio, Partido Nacional, and Partido Colorado have demonstrated that they do not look after local needs or respect the interests of Uruguayans. On the contrary, they are aligned with the model of global governance that aspires to eliminate nation-states and their respective cultural identities.

How can the concrete interests of the Uruguayan people be defended if all politicians adhere to the global agenda, regardless of the party to which they belong?

The divide is clear and definitive: it separates lackeys from patriots.