The march in front of the Government House demonstrated the resistance of a sector that refuses to compete on equal terms
Nuevo
Agregar La Derecha Diario en
Compartir:
At noon on Wednesday, a group of taxi drivers staged a protest in Córdoba to oppose the presence of ride-hailing apps. The demonstration was organized by the Taxi Drivers' Union in front of the provincial Government House. Although an ordinance has already approved the operation of Uber and DiDi, the drivers insist on disregarding the regulation.
The protest was marked by a defiant tone and a lack of willingness to engage in dialogue, even though the activity of the apps has already been legalized by the City Council. The taxi drivers refuse to compete against a system chosen by users for its efficiency and lower cost. Instead, they prefer to pressure the authorities with blockades and protests rather than improve their service.
Miguel Arias, head of the union, stated: “The reason has to do with illegal transportation; the apps have tripled in the city and there is no kind of control.” The leader added: “We are truly concerned because the Municipality is not monitoring them.” However, his statements contradict the validity of a regulation that has already legalized the service.
Miguel Arias, titular del sindicato de peones de Córdoba
An outdated model that refuses to compete
The protest made it clear that the union is trying to maintain political privileges that no longer have institutional support. Arias even stated: “The governor, who promised us something different when he was mayor, is not protecting us.” The message reveals a coercive and desperate strategy to regain lost political advantages.
The taxi drivers allege a lack of oversight while the reality shows that people mostly choose to travel with apps for safety and price. Uber and DiDi offer a cheaper and more efficient service, which has highlighted the shortcomings of the taxi system. The union's rejection is nothing more than a refusal to accept that the market has shifted toward a better option.
In his stance, Arias was categorical: "We've taken this to court, we've filed an injunction, we don't want apps." The union leader also clarified: "Not me, I earn 500,000 pesos (1,102 pounds) working 10, 12 hours as a taxi driver, and am I going to make 30 or 40% of what I earn with the apps?" These statements reflect a fear of losing privileges, not a real debate about competition.
