The British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, accused technology entrepreneur Elon Musk on Thursday of trying to ''sow division'' in the United Kingdom following a series of posts on social media X related to the murder of student Henry Nowak, a case that has caused intense public outrage and reopened the debate about the actions of the British police.
The controversy revolves around the death of Nowak, 18, who was stabbed last year in Southampton by Vickrum Digwa, a citizen of Indian origin and Sikh religion. In the moments following the attack, Digwa managed to convince the responding officers that he had been the victim of a racist assault by the victim himself.
As a result, the police initially treated Nowak as a suspect. Footage released after the sentencing of Digwa shows officers restraining and handcuffing the young man while he was dying from stab wounds. In the video, the victim can be heard insisting that he had been stabbed and that he was having difficulty breathing, while the officers failed to recognize the severity of his injuries.

The release of the recordings sparked a wave of outrage across the country and fueled strong criticism of the security forces. Various protests took place in several British cities, as questions grew about whether ideological factors or fears of being accused of discrimination influenced police actions.
In this context, Musk used social media X to denounce the significant problem within Western institutions. The entrepreneur argued that the British police showed an automatic predisposition to believe the accusations of racism made by the assailant without verifying the facts.
''Did you know that the official policy of the police forces them to adopt a racist attitude towards whites? It is completely unacceptable and must change immediately,'' Musk wrote in one of his most commented posts.
In another message, the owner of X stated that ''the West has created a completely evil state religion where an accusation of racism is the most serious offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder.'' He also argued that the officers ended up treating the injured young man as guilty while the real attacker avoided immediate identification.
















