Expectation for the meeting between Donald Trump and Netanyahu

The meeting between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House is drawing international attention today. In the Oval Office, both leaders will address a 21-point proposal drafted by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, with the backing of the United States and the Arab League, which seeks a ceasefire in Gaza, the release of the 48 hostages kidnapped by Hamas—of whom only 20 are estimated to still be alive—and the establishment of a transitional framework in the Strip.

In Israel, the initiative has sparked intense debates. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich made it clear that his party, Religious Zionism, will only support the plan if it includes concrete guarantees: the complete dismantling of Hamas, absolute control by Israeli forces over the Gaza perimeter—including the strategic Philadelphi Corridor alongside Egypt—and the exclusion of any role for the Palestinian Authority. Smotrich also rejected Qatar's participation and demanded that Egypt allow the voluntary departure of Gazans.

Netanyahu shares several of these red lines. The draft plan, known as GITA, opens the possibility of a path toward a Palestinian state after the reconstruction of Gaza, something the prime minister described as "pure madness" in his recent speech at the UN.

Israel insists that any solution must guarantee its long-term security, prevent terrorist rearmament, and maintain freedom of military action in the face of threats.

However, objections are emerging from the Arab world and the Palestinian Authority in the opposite direction. They consider the text too demanding on Hamas and seek to replace absolute disarmament with only a partial handover of weapons, in addition to ensuring a central role for the PA in the transition.

They also oppose international forces operating inside Gaza, limiting their deployment exclusively to the border.

The figure of Tony Blair and the role of Qatar have become additional points of friction. Meanwhile, the United States insists on keeping Doha as a key mediator, while Israel warns that its influence in the postwar period could perpetuate funding and political support for Hamas.

In this scenario, the challenge is enormous: reconciling Israel's non-negotiable security demands with the pressures of Arab actors seeking to preserve their own interests.

For now, Hamas hasn't even formally received the document, and the plan remains in diplomatic limbo. For Jerusalem, the priority remains clear: without the total defeat of Hamas and without solid security guarantees, there will be no true peace in Gaza.