The fact that circulates with force on networks and that makes the defenders of the official narrative so uncomfortable is neither an invention nor a militant exaggeration. It comes from the ICILS 2023 (International Computer and Information Literacy Study), the most rigorous and recognized international study to measure students' real competencies in the use of computers and the management of digital information. It is carried out by the IEA (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement), the same organization that makes the TIMSS and PIRLS, with impeccable technical standards and the participation of dozens of countries
.Uruguay participated in this 2023 cycle evaluating students in the second year of secondary education (high school or UTU), exactly the group referred to in the phrase “1 in 10 children”. The results were published at the end of 2024 and are devastating for the country that boasted for years of being a “world pioneer” in digital inclusion
thanks to the Ceibal Plan.ICILS isn't about knowing how to turn on a computer or open Word. The test evaluates two large dimensions. First, Computer and Information Literacy (CIL), which is the ability to use computers to effectively research, create and communicate information. This includes searching for relevant information on the Internet, evaluating its reliability, organizing it, avoiding dubious sources and producing digital products judiciously. Second, it measures Computational Thinking (CT), that is, computational thinking that involves sequencing, algorithms and
structured problem solving.Performance levels at CIL range from Low 1, where students achieve almost nothing, to Level 4, which represents an advanced domain with accurate evaluative judgment and total control when searching for and creating information.
Uruguay's raw numbers in ICILS 2023 are worrying. 33% of Uruguayan students are below Level 1, which means they are unable to perform even the simplest tasks on the test. Adding Level 1, approximately 64% of students do not exceed the minimum level, that is, they do not demonstrate basic functional use under direct instruction for explicit information collection and management tasks. Only about 10-11% reach the highest levels (Level 3 or 4), where students can autonomously search for information, critically evaluate it, and create products with independence and precision. Hence the famous phrase of “1 in 10” who knows how to use the computer to obtain relevant information.
In computational thinking, Uruguay recorded the lowest average score of all participating countries, with 421 points, well below the international average. To put this into context, the international average shows that 24% is below Level 1, while in Uruguay it is 33%. Only 1% of students worldwide reach Level 4 of excellence, and in Uruguay that proportion is marginal
.In addition, the public-private divide is brutal. In public schools, only 28% exceed Level 1 in CIL, compared to 66% in private schools. In computational thinking, 40% versus 70%. Although part of that difference is explained by the students' socioeconomic context, it remains an open wound in a plan that promised equity








