The national Government explained the reasons behind Resolution 42/2026 of the National Institute of Industrial Technology (INTI), which ordered the cancellation of nearly 1,000 technical services that the agency carried out. The Minister of Deregulation and State Transformation, Federico Sturzenegger, explained why progress was made with the cut: it is not a matter of closing the institute, but rather a restructuring to eliminate benefits without real demand or that could already be solved in the private sector
.The axis of the decision, the Government explained, involves ordering the use of resources and avoiding overlaps. For years, INTI maintained services that, in many cases, the market was already able to offer. Under this logic, state intervention not only ceased to be necessary, but it also ended up displacing potential private competitors
.
That is, benefits offered at artificially low prices that meant that the real cost would be absorbed by the State. The measure aims to correct this distortion and return these activities to the private sphere









