In a firm decision that reaffirms the commitment to the defense of the most essential human rights, the Government of Javier Milei submitted a formal objection to the Organization of American States (OAS) to oppose the inclusion of the group “Catholics for the Right to Decide” (CDD).
This radical pro-abortion feminist group was on the official list of Argentine organizations invited to the upcoming General Assembly of the organization, to be held from June 25 to 27 in Antigua and Barbuda.
The measure was supported by a statement in which Milei's Government “specifically dissociates itself” from CDD's participation, recalling that its position is incompatible with the principle of protection of the right to life from conception, enshrined in Article 4 of the American Convention on Human Rights.
Javier Milei, presidente de Argentina.
Far from being an act of censorship, as the feminist group claimed, this action constitutes a clear and consistent message with the stance of an administration that values human life as an inalienable right, even before birth.
In a country where the lives of the most defenseless have been violated for years in the name of supposed reproductive freedom, Milei's Government is setting an ethical and legal precedent.
Organizations like CDD, which present themselves as “Catholic and feminist,” only seek to advocate for the killing of babies and attempt to reinterpret religious doctrines for ideological purposes.
Javier Milei, presidente de Argentina.
The use of the term “Catholics” by a group that promotes the deliberate elimination of innocent human lives openly contradicts the traditional values of Catholicism.
In this regard, Milei's Government's decision to reject its representation as an Argentine organization within the OAS framework is a demonstration of diplomatic and moral consistency.
Javier Milei's administration stands out for not yielding to ideological pressures from progressivism and is committed to building a country where respect for life, family, and essential values prevails over sectoral interests that seek to impose a partial view of human rights.
