While thousands of Uruguayans suffered the interruption of the electrical supply on the afternoon of Thursday, May 15, from the air-conditioned offices of UTE, the same complacent statements as always were rehearsed. The official explanation: a "failure"—a textbook euphemism—in an underground cable "absolutely reliable" (words of the operations manager himself, Luis García), which left about 150,000 customers in Montevideo without power.
The entity's discourse, as usual, oscillates between technical self-complacency and bureaucratic denial. How can the "absolutely reliable" fail? How can a "totally redundant" system leave half of Montevideo without service for almost an hour? The answer is simple, although politically uncomfortable: it is a state monopoly, ossified, with no real incentives to improve or be accountable to the citizens, whom it keeps captive as forced customers.
See also: the cost of monopolies and tailored bailouts
UTE acts as if it provides a free service out of institutional kindness, when in reality it charges some of the highest rates in the region, manages resources without real competition, and hides behind the myth of its efficiency, while the entire country goes dark—literally—due to its ineptitude.
This episode is not an exception, but another symptom of what happens when the State clings to the exclusive provision of services that could—and should—be opened to the market, to competition, to innovation, and to effective citizen control. It's not about privatizing for ideology, but about breaking the structural comfort of those who operate without competition or consequences.








